new podcast episode -How you can prepare for and adapt to wildfires

Our Executive Director, John Rizza was invited to the Calling all CattleWomen Podcast last week! Please tune in to the official podcast of the American National CattleWomen. Whether you’re a lifelong rancher, an advocate for agriculture, or simply passionate about the beef community, this podcast is for you.

Episode Description:

We are seeing more frequent and intense wildfire than ever before. Landowners in the West must be prepared to minimize their risk and adapt after a wildfire. In this episode, TRWC's Director, John Rizza, to discuss how landowners can assess their risk of wildfire, the steps you can take to minimize fire intensity, and how to adapt after a fire.

Listen to the Podcast here

For more information on this story tworiverswildfirecoalition@gmail.com, or (970) 462-7071.

How Strategic Chipping Days in Glade Park Helped Crews Focus on the Work

Turning a Grant Into Real Progress in Glade Park

Chipping days are one of those wildfire mitigation tools that sound simple on paper—and quickly become complicated in practice.

Clean, well organized roadside chipper piles made by the landowner, help the crew efficiently clear mateials from the HIZ

Landowners need clear instructions. Piles have to be built correctly. Routes need to be planned. Crews need to move efficiently. And someone has to coordinate dozens of conversations before the first chip ever hits the ground.

In Glade Park, that coordination is exactly what made the difference.

The Opportunity—and the Challenge

The Mesa County Sheriff's Office Wildland Fire Team secured grant funding to purchase a chipper and commit to a set number of community chipping days. Like many grants, the funding was solid—but where and how those days would be used was flexible.

Without coordination, those days could have landed anywhere.

Instead, Two Rivers Wildfire Coalition helped direct the effort toward Glade Park, one of the county’s longest-running and most engaged Neighborhood Ambassador areas. These were neighborhoods where residents already understood their wildfire risk, had been actively mitigating for years, and were ready to take the next step.

Organizing the Work So Crews Could Do Their Jobs

Crews were able to mitigate significant hazardous fuels and even hauled to a disposal location where chips left on ground were not feasible.

Through the efforts of the Glade Park Wildfire Mitigation Cooperative, 24 landowners across four neighborhoods signed up to participate. Each landowner completed their own mitigation work—cutting, thinning, and hauling material to roadside piles.

Behind the scenes, TRWC handled the heavy lift:

• Creating maps and routing plans for crews

• Canvassing neighborhoods and distributing clear instructions

• Calling landowners, sending reminders, and sharing photos of proper pile setup

• Coordinating access, timing, and a chip disposal site

• Labeling and identifying every pile in advance

  
  

By the time crews arrived, the work was staged, organized, and ready.

The result: the Wildland Fire Team was able to show up with a plan and focus entirely on chipping, not logistics.

Efficient Operations, Real Results

Over several days, crews chipped and managed piles across Glade Park—broadcasting chips where appropriate and hauling material away from residential areas when needed.

The numbers tell the story:

• 24 participating landowners

• 325+ hours of landowner labor reported

• 240+ acres treated

• Some landowners effectively treated entire 40-acre parcels through this effort alone

  
  

That kind of impact doesn’t happen by accident. It happens when residents, agencies, and coordination capacity are aligned.

Why This Model Works

For residents, the benefit is obvious: real help dealing with green waste—often the biggest barrier to sustained mitigation.

For the Wildland Fire Team, the payoff is just as important:

• Grant commitments delivered efficiently

• Crews operating at full productivity

• Minimal time spent on phone calls, troubleshooting, or rework

  
  

For everyone involved, it’s proof that wildfire mitigation isn’t a one-and-done effort. It’s a long-term relationship with the land—and with each other.

When coordination is handled well, everyone gets to focus on what they do best.

That’s how limited resources go further. And that’s the kind of partnership Two Rivers Wildfire Coalition exists to support.

For more information on this story tworiverswildfirecoalition@gmail.com, or (970) 462-7071.

Learning Exchange: Wildfire Mitigation in Fruita, CO

Learning Together, Right Where the Work Is Happening

On January 15, Two Rivers Wildfire Coalition hosted a wildfire learning exchange in Mesa County at the Lower Valley Fire District project area—right where mitigation work is actively underway along Little Salt Wash.

Rather than gathering around a table, twenty-two participants walked nearly a mile of draw together. Fire professionals, nonprofit partners, private citizens, contractors, land managers, and state representatives came to see the work, talk through challenges, and learn from one another in real time.

That mix of participants mattered, because this work touches so much more than wildfire risk alone.

Balancing Real-World Needs

This project corridor is a high-use landscape. It includes invasive fuels, a recreation trail, nearby homes, waterways, and agricultural land—all compressed into one narrow system.

This was the first learning exchange hosted by TRWC in a setting that felt more urban than rural, and it surfaced challenges that don’t always show up in larger, more remote project areas.

Those challenges weren’t treated as problems to avoid. They were treated as realities to manage—together.

Participants discussed what it really means to balance:

• Fire protection

• Recreation and access

• Shading, privacy, habitat, and neighbor concerns

• Long-term maintenance and public expectations

Seeing the Full System—Including Water

One of the most valuable moments of the day came from an unexpected angle: water quality.

A local water professional raised an important issue—when mitigation work happens along critical waterways, activities like mastication or targeted grazing can temporarily influence water sampling results. Without communication, those short-term changes can look like data problems rather than reflections of real, known work happening upstream.

The takeaway was simple but important: coordination doesn’t stop at fuels.

Better communication between project partners and water monitoring groups can help ensure that sampling protocols align with on-the-ground conditions—and that data is interpreted in context, not isolation. It’s the kind of insight that only surfaces when the right people are standing in the same place, having the same conversation.

After sheep grazing this area, there was a significant reduction in invasives!

Hearing Directly From the People Doing the Work

One of the most valuable pieces of the day was hearing directly from the contractor implementing targeted grazing. Participants learned how sheep are used strategically, how herds are moved, and how grazing operations interface with the public.

Sheep grazing along Little Salt Wash this fall

Mesa County Weed & Pest also shared insights on herbicide selection, timing, and monitoring—what’s working, what isn’t, and why. That kind of honest feedback loop helps everyone refine their approach and reduce unnecessary inputs over time.

Why These Exchanges Matter

These learning exchanges don’t pretend that coordination is solved. They acknowledge that there’s still work to do. But they create a shared starting point—one where agencies, partners, and practitioners can be honest about challenges, align messaging, and move forward together.

There are still areas where canopy density feels heavier than ideal. There are tradeoffs between objectives. But the bigger questions were the right ones:

• Did this work improve firefighter and resident safety?

• Did it reduce invasive fuels and overall fire intensity?

• Did it buy time—for evacuation, response, and decision-making?

The answer to all three was yes.

Wildfire mitigation isn’t about creating a risk-free landscape. It’s about reducing risk to a level a community can live with—while protecting the many values tied to the land and water.

That’s how fragmented efforts begin to turn into something more durable. And that’s exactly the kind of work Two Rivers Wildfire Coalition exists to support.